To avoid distortions when merging the two crops in PS, the DxO image was converted to TIFF before import into PS (i.e. The second image shows the same crop from DxO (without extra sharpening!). The top 100% crop shows the central area of a shot after import into ACR, but without any further processing. "Do not sharpen" does not mean "without any sharpening" in PureRaw! Even without a check mark in the DxO dialog, sharpening is applied during development – but much more gently than with a check mark. Whether I use the (disengageable) pre-sharpening depends on the individual case.ĭo you think its better at removing noise than Topaz or On1. This way, the output DNG is optimally prepared for further processing in ACR, etc. I use DxO PureRaw as the first program in the processing chain, because the DeepPrime Denoiser performs the best and gentlest denoising already in RAW. The D300 more than the more modern D7100 and D7500. My three Nikon cameras are mostly used in wildlife photography with very long tele lenses and accordingly have some noise. If DxO then also does a good job of rectification and devignetting with the Mini 3 profile, then there is finally a way out for all the people without the previously alternative-less Adobe image correction. DJI's DNGs, by their very nature, suffer from ugly noise, which is rendered almost harmless right at the beginning of the processing chain with this tool. The denoising – and not necessarily the sharpening – is for me the decisive criterion for DxO DeepPrime. Whether I use the (disengageable) pre-sharpening depends on the individual case. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Looking forward to see if its good enough to move me away from Adobe.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |